

Audi R8 LMS GT3 EVO II DTM


BMW M4 GT3 DTM


Ferrari 296 GT3 DTM


Mercedes-AMG GT3 2020 DTM


Porsche 911 GT3 R (992) DTM


Audi R8 LMS


Audi R8 LMS GT3 EVO


Audi R8 LMS GT3 EVO II


Audi R8 LMS Ultra


Bentley Continental GT3


Bentley Continental GT3 EVO


BMW Alpina B6 GT3


BMW M4 GT3


BMW M6 GT3


BMW Z4 GT3


Callaway Corvette C7 GT3-R


Chevrolet Camaro GT3


Chevrolet Corvette Z06.R GT3


Ferrari 296 GT3


Ferrari 488 GT3 EVO 2020


Ford GT GT3


Ford Mustang GT3


McLaren 650S GT3


McLaren 720S GT3


McLaren MP4-12C GT3


Mercedes AMG GT3


Mercedes-AMG GT3 2020


Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG GT3


Nissan GT-R GT3


P4-5 Competizione GT3


Porsche 911 GT3 R


Porsche 911 GT3 R (2019)


Porsche 911 GT3 R (992)


RUF RT12R GTR3
Vega - you're being mean to me why?
Angus you have been banned because you don't drive with respect. Also the fact that you joined in under a different name after you got banned a couple of weeks ago.
GT3 DTM 2023 Champ Brands Hatch involving drivers @antonio Stefanov and Viktor Svensson @Car 1 (Svensson) appears somewhat reckless, as it lightly contacts the rear of car 8 ( @antonio Stefanov ) while accelerating down the straight at the beginning of the clip. This contact forces car 8 to adopt a highly defensive posture, which adversely affects their entry into Turn 5, necessitating a more substantial braking effort for a corner that typically requires only a brief brake application or a gentle trail brake. Consequently, car 1, which follows a more conventional approach to the corner, seems to be caught off guard.
Had it not been for the contact along the straight, one might argue that the incident stemmed from a mere misjudgement rather than intentional aggression; however, this unnecessary assertiveness raises questions. It would be reasonable to impose a entry-level penalty currently applies to car 1, with a deduction of three championship points. Car 8 is justified in taking a defensive line into Turn 5, and car 1 should have anticipated this, executing the manoeuvre on the exit instead. Nevertheless, the available footage does not sufficiently meet the necessary standards for a conclusive judgment which could have made this to be a bigger penalty